The Competition Authority of Kenya, in a recent decision, has fined a major player in the retail sector approx. USD 6.8M for abuse of buyer power. The freedom of parties to freely negotiate the terms under which they are willing to enter into a contract with each other remains a fundamental tenet in the negotiation and entry into commercial agreements in Kenya. However, the freedom of contracts can be limited by law where a party has significantly more bargaining power than the other party.
The Authority is tasked with enforcing the abuse of buyer power provisions under the Competition Act, No. 12 of 2010 Laws of Kenya in a bid to promote fair business practices and competition in Kenya.
The Competition Act defines buyer power as the influence of a purchaser of goods and/or services to obtain from a supplier or service provider goods and/or services on terms that are more favorable to the purchaser than the supplier/service provider.
For a purchaser to impose its terms on a supplier or service provider, the purchaser must command such a large portion of the consumer market such that it can cause the price of the products or services to fall by purchasing less or cause the price to rise by purchasing more.
The exercise of such power to the detriment of suppliers for the gain of purchasers is considered as an abuse of buyer power. In determining whether a buyer with buyer power has abused it, the Authority will largely consider the following:
i) the commercial terms of the contracts with suppliers
ii) the dependency of the supplier on the buyer
The Authority is empowered to impose a financial penalty of up to ten percent (10%) of the preceding financial year’s gross turnover in Kenya for persons in contravention. It is imperative that agreements are properly negotiated to avoid impeding the provisions of the Act.
--
Read the original publication at Clyde & Co